EPRI/SQURTS Process Test Rep Feedback Survey
Choose week number:
160: 12/3/2012 - 12/7/2012
159: 10/8/2012 - 10/12/2012
158: 8/27/2012 - 8/31/2012
157: 7/16/2012 - 7/20/2012
156: 6/4/2012 - 6/8/2012
155: 4/23/2012 - 4/27/2012
154: 3/12/2012 - 3/16/2012
153: 1/30/2012 - 2/3/2012
152: 12/5/2011 - 12/9/2011
151: 10/10/2011 - 10/14/2011
150: 8/29/2011 - 9/2/2011
149: 7/18/2011 - 7/22/2011
148: 6/6/2011 - 6/10/2011
147: 4/25/2011 - 4/29/2011
146: 3/7/2011 - 3/11/2011
145: 1/24/2011 - 1/28/2011
144: 12/6/2010 - 12/10/2010
143: 11/1/2010 - 11/5/2010
142: 9/20/2010 - 9/24/2010
141: 8/2/2010 - 8/6/2010
140: 6/21/2010 - 6/25/2010
139: 5/3/2010 - 5/7/2010
138: 3/22/2010 - 3/26/2010
137: 2/8/2010 - 2/12/2010
136: 12/7/2009 - 12/11/2009
135: 10/26/2009 - 10/30/2009
134: 9/14/2009 - 9/18/2009
133: 8/3/2009 - 8/7/2009
132: 6/22/2009 - 6/26/2009
131: 5/4/2009 - 5/8/2009
130: 3/23/2009 - 3/27/2009
129: 2/9/2009 - 2/13/2009
128: 12/1/2008 - 12/5/2008
127: 10/20/2008 - 10/24/2008
126: 9/8/2008 - 9/12/2008
125: 7/21/2008 - 7/25/2008
124: 6/9/2008 - 6/13/2008
123: 4/28/2008 - 5/2/2008
122: 3/10/2008 - 3/14/2008
121: 1/28/2008 - 2/1/2008
120: 12/3/2007 - 12/7/2007
119: 10/22/2007 - 10/26/2007
118: 9/10/2007 - 9/14/2007
117: 7/23/2007 - 7/27/2007
116: 6/11/2007 - 6/15/2007
115: 4/30/2007 - 5/4/2007
114: 3/19/2007 - 3/23/2007
113: 2/5/2007 - 2/9/2007
112: 11/27/2006 - 12/1/2006
111: 10/9/2006 - 10/13/2006
110: 8/28/2006 - 9/1/2006
109: 7/17/2006 - 7/21/2006
108: 6/5/2006 - 6/9/2006
107: 4/24/2006 - 4/28/2006
106: 3/6/2006 - 3/10/2006
105: 1/23/2006 - 1/27/2006
104: 11/14/2005 - 11/18/2005
103: 10/3/2005 - 10/7/2005
102: 8/22/2005 - 8/26/2005
101: 7/11/2005 - 7/15/2005
100: 6/6/2005 - 6/10/2005
99: 4/25/2005 - 4/29/2005
98: 3/7/2005 - 3/11/2005
97: 1/24/2005 - 1/28/2005
96: 11/29/2004 - 12/3/2004
Note: please select projects which you were witness of...
SQURTS Project:
S120XSE
Levels:
Table Limits - 14g
Test Rep:
Tentative Test Date:
Utility
Manufacturer
Description
Model
Sup.
Due
Rec'd
Submit'l
TT Proj
FENOC / Davis-Besse
Lambda Electronics
Power Supply
LXS-CC-28R
Trentec
5-Mar
22-Dec
never quoted
FENOC / Davis-Besse
Lambda
Power Supply
LNS-Z-15
Trentec
5-Mar
18-Feb
CJ1401
FENOC / Davis-Besse
Alco Controls
Solenoid valve
240RA12T7-M
Trentec
5-Mar
4-Jun
Quote#47169-no PO
FirstEnergy Corp (FE-BV)
ATC
RELAY, TIMING, 24 VDC, AND RESISTOR P/N: 3652602600
365C300N30PX
QualTech
5-Mar
15-Dec
1-Jun
CJ752
PSEG-Nuclear, LLC
GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.
RELAY, MULTI-TRIP / AUXILIARY, 48VDC COIL
HFA53J44H
QualTech
5-Mar
20-Jan
CJ1431
FENOC / Davis-Besse
Automation Industries
Power Supply
CEA6A480Y252FLP3
Trentec
5-Mar
22-Dec
Quote 21247-2905
SQURTS Project:
S12XXSE
Levels:
Floor
Test Rep:
Dick Hoskins, WSRC
Tentative Test Date:
Utility
Manufacturer
Description
Model
Sup.
Due
Rec'd
Submit'l
TT Proj
SRR
Cash
Pressure Control Valve
G-60, Valve#10585
Utility
5-Mar
4-Jan
SNC / GPC - Plant Hatch
GE
Selector Switch, Maintained Contact, 4 Position, w/ Yellow Ring, QualTech Prop #CQ1385
CR2940UB207W
QualTech
5-Mar
17-Nov
SNC / GPC - Plant Hatch
GE
relay, 300V, 4pole, 3NO, 1NC contacts, 115-120VAC Coil, #CQ1547
CR120A03102AA relay
QualTech
5-Mar
17-Nov
XCEL / Procurement
Struthers Dunn
Relay & Socket
219BBX222NE / 27390
QualTech
5-Mar
4-Jan
CJ1363
SRR
Cameron/Barton
Delta P Gauge
227C w/224C DPU, 0-600 in wc
Utility
5-Mar
4-Jan
SRR
Cash
Pressure Control Valve
FRM-2 S1-S0 @ 160Psi, valve#10673
Utility
5-Mar
4-Jan
SRR
Spence
Pressure Control Valve
#710EADE-A250 (250Psi)
Utility
5-Mar
4-Jan
SRR
Cameron/Barton
Delta P Gauge
227C w/224C DPU, 0-600 in wc
Utility
5-Mar
5-Jan
SRR
Cameron/Barton
Delta P Gauge
227C w/224C DPU, 0-600 in wc
Utility
5-Mar
5-Jan
SRR
Rego
Pressure Relief Valve
#PRV19432T350 ASME SEC VIII
Utility
5-Mar
5-Jan
SRR
Cameron/Barton
Delta P Gauge
227C w/ 224C DPU, 0-600 IN WC
Utility
5-Mar
5-Jan
Wolf Creek
Fisher Controls
REGULATOR, PRESSURE, 0-20 PSIG, 1/4 IN NPT, REDUCING, 250 PSIG MAX INLET, STAINLESS STEEL, WITH FLUO
P/N FS67CR-205/V/VP/PM3
Utility
5-Mar
10-Jan
SRR
CPI
Pressure Gauge
G-21, 2 1/2" Dial, 0-400 Psi
Utility
5-Mar
4-Jan
Witness Information:
Witness Name:
Email:
Utility:
Test Item Submittals:
Were submittals received in a timely manner?:
Were submittals completed with required information?:
Did submittals adequately identified any needs?:
Was the information supplied on the submittals accurate?:
Comments:
Test Schedule:
Was the schedule developed and available in time to accommodate you?:
Yes
No
Was the schedule followed?:
Yes
No
Was your input solicited in schedule formation?:
Yes
No
Were your scheduling needs met?:
Yes
No
Comments:
Test Plans:
Were the plans submitted to you timely enough for review?:
Yes
No
Did the plans adequately meet your needs?:
Yes
No
Were sponsoring utility plan reviews and approvals timely?:
Yes
No
Were required plan revisions made in a timely fashion?:
Yes
No
Comments:
Test Setup:
Were Trentec supplied test samples avail. to support test schedule?:
Were utility supplied test samples avail. to support test schedule?:
Were utility supplied test samples packaged appropriately for shipment to Trentec?:
Were Trentec supplied fixtures available to support the test schedule?:
Were utility supplied fixtures available to support the test schedule?:
Were Trentec supplied hardware available to support the test schedule?:
Were utility supplied hardware available to support the test schedule?:
Were the tests set up and ready to go in accordance with the test schedule?:
Comments:
Test Performance:
Were all baseline functional tests performed in advance?:
Yes
No
Were all baseline functional anomalies identified and addressed?:
Yes
No
Were sismic operability tests performed in accordance with the test plans?:
Yes
No
Were items monitored appropriately during seismic events?:
Yes
No
Was the sponsoring utility contacted for any problems?:
Yes
No
If so, were the contacts specified on the submittal available and helpful?:
Yes
No
Were site-specific tests levels provided in case items did not meet generic levels?:
Yes
No
Did the seismic table perform without difficulty?:
Yes
No
Comments:
Test Sample Performance:
Did any test items perform abnormally?:
Yes
No
Were there any modifications required to make a test sample pass?:
Yes
No
Was the item description provided by the utility/manufacturer accurate and adequate?:
Yes
No
Were any lessons learned to help procure an item better?:
Yes
No
Comments:
Personnel:
Were Trentec personnel available and prepared to conduct and monitor tests?:
Yes
No
Were Trentec personnel technically capable of addressing problems?:
Yes
No
Were Trentec personnel courteous and helpful?:
Yes
No
Comments:
Overall:
Identify any strong points in this test sequence:
Identify any weak points in this test sequence:
General Comments: